Can a statutory demand be served by email in Australia?

Yes, a statutory demand can be served by email under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), provided the requirements of Part 1.2AA are met. The email must be sent to an address reasonably believed to be current and the document must be accessible by the recipient. Actual opening of the email is not required—only retrievability matters under the law.

What legislation allows email service of statutory demands?

Part 1.2AA of the Corporations Act 2001, particularly sections 110C and 110D, governs electronic service. These provisions were introduced by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Modernising Business Communications and Other Measures) Act 2023, replacing the now-repealed section 600G. This updated framework enables documents like statutory demands to be served by email or electronic link, provided they are accessible.

When did the new electronic service rules take effect?

The key reforms took effect on 15 September 2023, when section 600G was repealed and Part 1.2AA commenced in full for insolvency-related documents. Although the broader Part 1.2AA framework began earlier, this specific date marks when it became fully applicable to statutory demands and similar notices.

Is there a requirement for the email to be read by the recipient?

No. Under section 105A, a document is deemed received once it becomes capable of being retrieved at the recipient’s nominated electronic address. The law does not require the recipient to read or open the email. This deeming provision is critical for validating service via electronic communication.

What is the 21-day rule for statutory demands?

A debtor company has 21 days from the date of service to respond to a statutory demand—either by paying the debt, negotiating with the creditor, or applying to set the demand aside in court. Missing this strict deadline results in a legal presumption of insolvency, allowing the creditor to apply to wind up the company.

Can a statutory demand be emailed to a director’s personal address?

Yes, if that email address has been used in formal company communications and is reasonably considered a nominated address. Courts have accepted personal emails as valid service points if there’s a pattern of consistent use, as in Stamford Bridge SW6 Pty Ltd v Cox [2024] NSWSC 486.

What if the company never opens the email?

Opening the email is not necessary. If the document is retrievable at the recipient’s email address, it is deemed served under section 105A. This shifts the responsibility to the debtor to monitor electronic correspondence, making missed emails no excuse for ignoring legal obligations.

What if the email goes to spam or junk?

The law does not excuse delivery failures due to internal email filtering. If the email is sent to an address reasonably believed to be valid and is retrievable, service is legally effective. Companies must check all folders, including spam, as part of their compliance procedures.

What is the risk of relying solely on email service?

The key risk is a challenge over whether service was valid. The sender must prove the document was sent to a valid address and was retrievable. Failure to retain delivery records or metadata can undermine the validity of service. For contested matters, traditional service methods may be safer.

What is meant by “reasonably accessible” under the Act?

“Reasonably accessible” means the document can be opened and read by the recipient without unreasonable barriers. For example, a PDF attached to an email would qualify. A corrupted or password-protected file without instructions may not meet this standard, risking the service being invalid.

Do you need a delivery or read receipt?

While not legally mandatory, a delivery or read receipt is highly recommended. It provides strong evidence the email was received. Email metadata, headers, and server logs should also be kept to support proof of service in case the debtor challenges the demand in court.

What happens if a statutory demand is served incorrectly?

If service is defective, the demand may be set aside or deemed never served, resetting the 21-day timeline. This can delay enforcement or render a winding-up application invalid. It’s essential to meet all service requirements, especially when relying on electronic delivery.

Can I serve a statutory demand by sending a link (e.g. Dropbox)?

Yes, under section 110D(1)(d) and (e), you can serve a statutory demand by providing a link to a document stored online—provided it is readily accessible and the recipient is reasonably expected to retrieve it. Make sure the link is not expired and doesn’t require login credentials without notice.

Are there any cases interpreting the new Part 1.2AA yet?

As of now, no court decisions have specifically applied Part 1.2AA to service of a statutory demand. However, courts have referenced transitional provisions (such as in Stamford Bridge v Cox), and it’s expected future case law will clarify interpretation under this new regime.

Should creditors still use postal or personal service?

Yes, in some cases. Traditional service under section 109X remains valid and may be preferable for high-value debts, likely disputes, or where email usage is unclear. It provides stronger evidence (e.g., affidavits of service) and avoids arguments over delivery failures or email validity.

What is a “nominated electronic address”?

This is an address explicitly or implicitly accepted by the company for communication. It can include emails used in prior dealings or registered with ASIC. Even if not formally nominated, consistent use in business correspondence may qualify under the Corporations Act.

How can debtors protect themselves from missing an emailed demand?

Debtors should implement strict email monitoring procedures. This includes checking all folders, monitoring ASIC-registered addresses, and designating responsible staff to flag legal correspondence. Prompt legal advice is essential if a demand is received—waiting even a day too long can be fatal to any response.

What if the demand is served late in the day or on a weekend?

Timing rules from section 105A apply. A document is taken to be received when it becomes retrievable. If sent after business hours or on a non-business day, it may still be deemed served that same day unless otherwise agreed. However, it’s safest to serve during business hours for clarity.

Can a company challenge the validity of email service?

Yes, but only if they can show the requirements of sections 110C and 110D were not met—e.g., that the address used was not valid, or the document was not reasonably accessible. Courts will scrutinise the sender’s evidence closely, so a weak challenge may fail if records are strong.

What’s the safest way to prove email service?

Retain email headers, delivery receipts, server logs, and confirmation that the address was in active use. Using reputable email software or tracking tools can enhance reliability. If in doubt, consider a combined service approach: send both by email and traditional method for maximum protection.

Can a statutory demand be served by email in Australia?

Yes, a statutory demand can be served by email under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), provided the requirements of Part 1.2AA are met. The email must be sent to an address reasonably believed to be current and the document must be accessible by the recipient. Actual opening of the email is not required—only retrievability matters under the law.

What legislation allows email service of statutory demands?

Part 1.2AA of the Corporations Act 2001, particularly sections 110C and 110D, governs electronic service. These provisions were introduced by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Modernising Business Communications and Other Measures) Act 2023, replacing the now-repealed section 600G. This updated framework enables documents like statutory demands to be served by email or electronic link, provided they are accessible.

When did the new electronic service rules take effect?

The key reforms took effect on 15 September 2023, when section 600G was repealed and Part 1.2AA commenced in full for insolvency-related documents. Although the broader Part 1.2AA framework began earlier, this specific date marks when it became fully applicable to statutory demands and similar notices.

Is there a requirement for the email to be read by the recipient?

No. Under section 105A, a document is deemed received once it becomes capable of being retrieved at the recipient’s nominated electronic address. The law does not require the recipient to read or open the email. This deeming provision is critical for validating service via electronic communication.

What is the 21-day rule for statutory demands?

A debtor company has 21 days from the date of service to respond to a statutory demand—either by paying the debt, negotiating with the creditor, or applying to set the demand aside in court. Missing this strict deadline results in a legal presumption of insolvency, allowing the creditor to apply to wind up the company.

Can a statutory demand be emailed to a director’s personal address?

Yes, if that email address has been used in formal company communications and is reasonably considered a nominated address. Courts have accepted personal emails as valid service points if there’s a pattern of consistent use, as in Stamford Bridge SW6 Pty Ltd v Cox [2024] NSWSC 486.

What if the company never opens the email?

Opening the email is not necessary. If the document is retrievable at the recipient’s email address, it is deemed served under section 105A. This shifts the responsibility to the debtor to monitor electronic correspondence, making missed emails no excuse for ignoring legal obligations.

What if the email goes to spam or junk?

The law does not excuse delivery failures due to internal email filtering. If the email is sent to an address reasonably believed to be valid and is retrievable, service is legally effective. Companies must check all folders, including spam, as part of their compliance procedures.

What is the risk of relying solely on email service?

The key risk is a challenge over whether service was valid. The sender must prove the document was sent to a valid address and was retrievable. Failure to retain delivery records or metadata can undermine the validity of service. For contested matters, traditional service methods may be safer.

What is meant by “reasonably accessible” under the Act?

“Reasonably accessible” means the document can be opened and read by the recipient without unreasonable barriers. For example, a PDF attached to an email would qualify. A corrupted or password-protected file without instructions may not meet this standard, risking the service being invalid.

Do you need a delivery or read receipt?

While not legally mandatory, a delivery or read receipt is highly recommended. It provides strong evidence the email was received. Email metadata, headers, and server logs should also be kept to support proof of service in case the debtor challenges the demand in court.

What happens if a statutory demand is served incorrectly?

If service is defective, the demand may be set aside or deemed never served, resetting the 21-day timeline. This can delay enforcement or render a winding-up application invalid. It’s essential to meet all service requirements, especially when relying on electronic delivery.

Can I serve a statutory demand by sending a link (e.g. Dropbox)?

Yes, under section 110D(1)(d) and (e), you can serve a statutory demand by providing a link to a document stored online—provided it is readily accessible and the recipient is reasonably expected to retrieve it. Make sure the link is not expired and doesn’t require login credentials without notice.

Are there any cases interpreting the new Part 1.2AA yet?

As of now, no court decisions have specifically applied Part 1.2AA to service of a statutory demand. However, courts have referenced transitional provisions (such as in Stamford Bridge v Cox), and it’s expected future case law will clarify interpretation under this new regime.

Should creditors still use postal or personal service?

Yes, in some cases. Traditional service under section 109X remains valid and may be preferable for high-value debts, likely disputes, or where email usage is unclear. It provides stronger evidence (e.g., affidavits of service) and avoids arguments over delivery failures or email validity.

What is a “nominated electronic address”?

This is an address explicitly or implicitly accepted by the company for communication. It can include emails used in prior dealings or registered with ASIC. Even if not formally nominated, consistent use in business correspondence may qualify under the Corporations Act.

How can debtors protect themselves from missing an emailed demand?

Debtors should implement strict email monitoring procedures. This includes checking all folders, monitoring ASIC-registered addresses, and designating responsible staff to flag legal correspondence. Prompt legal advice is essential if a demand is received—waiting even a day too long can be fatal to any response.

What if the demand is served late in the day or on a weekend?

Timing rules from section 105A apply. A document is taken to be received when it becomes retrievable. If sent after business hours or on a non-business day, it may still be deemed served that same day unless otherwise agreed. However, it’s safest to serve during business hours for clarity.

Can a company challenge the validity of email service?

Yes, but only if they can show the requirements of sections 110C and 110D were not met—e.g., that the address used was not valid, or the document was not reasonably accessible. Courts will scrutinise the sender’s evidence closely, so a weak challenge may fail if records are strong.

What’s the safest way to prove email service?

Retain email headers, delivery receipts, server logs, and confirmation that the address was in active use. Using reputable email software or tracking tools can enhance reliability. If in doubt, consider a combined service approach: send both by email and traditional method for maximum protection.

Can a statutory demand be served by email in Australia?

Yes, a statutory demand can be served by email under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), provided the requirements of Part 1.2AA are met. The email must be sent to an address reasonably believed to be current and the document must be accessible by the recipient. Actual opening of the email is not required—only retrievability matters under the law.

What legislation allows email service of statutory demands?

Part 1.2AA of the Corporations Act 2001, particularly sections 110C and 110D, governs electronic service. These provisions were introduced by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Modernising Business Communications and Other Measures) Act 2023, replacing the now-repealed section 600G. This updated framework enables documents like statutory demands to be served by email or electronic link, provided they are accessible.

When did the new electronic service rules take effect?

The key reforms took effect on 15 September 2023, when section 600G was repealed and Part 1.2AA commenced in full for insolvency-related documents. Although the broader Part 1.2AA framework began earlier, this specific date marks when it became fully applicable to statutory demands and similar notices.

Is there a requirement for the email to be read by the recipient?

No. Under section 105A, a document is deemed received once it becomes capable of being retrieved at the recipient’s nominated electronic address. The law does not require the recipient to read or open the email. This deeming provision is critical for validating service via electronic communication.

What is the 21-day rule for statutory demands?

A debtor company has 21 days from the date of service to respond to a statutory demand—either by paying the debt, negotiating with the creditor, or applying to set the demand aside in court. Missing this strict deadline results in a legal presumption of insolvency, allowing the creditor to apply to wind up the company.

Can a statutory demand be emailed to a director’s personal address?

Yes, if that email address has been used in formal company communications and is reasonably considered a nominated address. Courts have accepted personal emails as valid service points if there’s a pattern of consistent use, as in Stamford Bridge SW6 Pty Ltd v Cox [2024] NSWSC 486.

What if the company never opens the email?

Opening the email is not necessary. If the document is retrievable at the recipient’s email address, it is deemed served under section 105A. This shifts the responsibility to the debtor to monitor electronic correspondence, making missed emails no excuse for ignoring legal obligations.

What if the email goes to spam or junk?

The law does not excuse delivery failures due to internal email filtering. If the email is sent to an address reasonably believed to be valid and is retrievable, service is legally effective. Companies must check all folders, including spam, as part of their compliance procedures.

What is the risk of relying solely on email service?

The key risk is a challenge over whether service was valid. The sender must prove the document was sent to a valid address and was retrievable. Failure to retain delivery records or metadata can undermine the validity of service. For contested matters, traditional service methods may be safer.

What is meant by “reasonably accessible” under the Act?

“Reasonably accessible” means the document can be opened and read by the recipient without unreasonable barriers. For example, a PDF attached to an email would qualify. A corrupted or password-protected file without instructions may not meet this standard, risking the service being invalid.

Do you need a delivery or read receipt?

While not legally mandatory, a delivery or read receipt is highly recommended. It provides strong evidence the email was received. Email metadata, headers, and server logs should also be kept to support proof of service in case the debtor challenges the demand in court.

Category: Corporations Law

Can You Serve a Statutory Demand by Email in Australia - Stat demand lawyer

Discuss Your Case With A Trusted Lawyer

We approach your dispute with – strategic thinking, commercial solutions & positive outcomes.Our honest process is designed to get you the best commercially sensible resolution

Litigation Services

Category: Corporations Law

Can You Serve a Statutory Demand by Email in Australia?

What is a Creditor’s Statutory Demand?

What are Fiduciary Duties in Australia?

Stonegate Legal Successfully Defends Federal Court Appeal

Directors Liability – When Are Directors Personally Liable?

What is a Shadow Director & De Facto Director?

Breach of Directors Duties in Australia

Deceit and Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Australia

Oppression Claims in Shareholder and Director Disputes

Unpaid Wages and the Fair Entitlements Guarantee

Wage Theft – Underpayment of Wages

What are Unfair Loans in Company Insolvency?

When is a Company Insolvent?

Recovering Outstanding Body Corporate Levies

Winding Up Order – How to Wind up a Company

Claim A No Obligation Case Evaluation

Discuss Your Case With A Trusted Lawyer

Quick Links

Litigation Services

Home

News & Blogs

Contact Us