Corporations Dispute in Australia?
Australia’s Trusted Company Disputes Lawyers. Fast, Confidential Legal Advice You Can Rely On.
Get Legal Help Now
Your details are 100% confidential.
Company Law
Corporations Disputes Lawyers
Clashes between corporations are rising in today’s business world, leading to disputes over contracts, IP, and partnerships. Stonegate Legal is here to help with a skilled team of corporate law and conflict resolution lawyers, committed to helping businesses succeed in complex legal challenges.
Stonegate Legal is a renowned corporate legal practice that stands out for its comprehensive solutions for corporate disputes. Our team offers a wide range of services that encompass legal advice, mediation, litigation, and arbitration. We specialise in corporate litigation, including contract disagreements, trust and estate controversies, and shareholder conflicts.
Our team of skilled lawyers possess an abundance of expertise in corporate law and are committed to assisting and providing counsel to our clients in any corporate-related disputes. We are devoted to delivering exceptional legal guidance and representation with the aim of protecting our clients’ interests and achieving favourable outcomes.
Don’t Let a Corporate Dispute Ruin Your Business!
Watch the Video to Understand Corporations Disputes in Australia
Learn the basics of corporate disputes, including what qualifies as a corporate dispute.
This video breaks it down with simple examples for better understanding.
What Are Corporate Disputes?
Corporate disputes arise when the legal, financial, or management relationships within a company break down. They are common across private companies, family businesses, and corporate groups, and often involve high financial stakes and complex legal issues.
A frequent category of corporate disputes involves oppression of minority shareholders, where majority shareholders or directors act in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial or discriminatory. This may include exclusion from management, diversion of company opportunities, dilution of shares, or failure to declare dividends. Courts have wide powers to grant remedies, including buy-out orders or compensation.
Another major source of corporate disputes is breach of directors’ duties. Directors are required to act in good faith, with care and diligence, and in the best interests of the company. Disputes commonly arise where directors misuse their position, fail to manage conflicts of interest, engage in insolvent trading, or prioritise personal interests over those of the company.
Corporate disputes also frequently involve breach of confidentiality, misuse of company information, or allegations of fraud or dishonesty by company officers, such as misappropriation of funds or misleading shareholders. These matters often carry serious civil and regulatory consequences.
In addition, disputes regularly arise from breaches of contract, including shareholders agreements, share sale agreements, and disagreements between shareholders and directors over company management and control. These overlapping issues contribute to the complexity and diversity of corporate disputes in Australia.
Expert Legal Representation for Complex Corporate Disputes
Experienced Legal Team
Corporate disputes can arise in any type of business or organisation, from small start-ups to large multinational corporations. These disputes can take many forms, including shareholder disputes, breach of contract claims, and disputes over intellectual property rights. When these disputes occur, it is important to work with a skilled legal team that has experience in resolving complex corporate disputes. At Stonegate Legal, we have a team of lawyers who are dedicated to helping clients navigate the legal process and achieve the best possible outcome in their case.
Effective Approach to Litigation
Resolving a corporate dispute can be a lengthy and complex process that requires a deep understanding of corporate law and business practices. Our team of lawyers work closely with our clients to develop a comprehensive strategy for resolving their dispute. This includes conducting a thorough investigation, negotiating with opposing parties, and, when necessary, litigating the case in court. Our goal is always to achieve the best possible outcome for our clients, whether through a settlement agreement or a favourable court ruling.
trusted defamation lawyers
What Are the Most Common Corporate Disputes?
Shareholder disputes (including minority shareholder oppression)
Shareholder disputes are the most common form of corporate dispute and usually arise where there is a breakdown in trust between owners of the business. These disputes frequently involve allegations that majority shareholders or those in control have acted in a way that is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or discriminatory to minority shareholders. Common examples include exclusion from management, diversion of company opportunities, dilution of shareholdings, refusal to declare dividends, or using company funds for personal benefit. In closely held and family companies, shareholder disputes often escalate quickly because ownership and management roles overlap, making informal resolution difficult once relationships deteriorate.
Breach of directors’ duties (including de-facto and shadow directors)
Disputes involving breach of directors’ duties commonly arise where directors are alleged to have failed to act in the best interests of the company or to have misused their position. Typical claims include conflicts of interest, self-dealing, improper related-party transactions, insolvent trading, or failure to exercise reasonable care and diligence. These disputes are particularly serious because directors may face personal liability, disqualification, or compensation orders. Claims may be brought by shareholders, liquidators, or other stakeholders, especially where financial distress or insolvency exposes past governance failures.
Contractual disputes (shareholders agreements and share sale agreements)
Contractual disputes are a major source of corporate litigation, particularly where shareholders’ agreements or share sale agreements are poorly drafted or no longer reflect how the business operates. Common issues include disputes over exit rights, valuation mechanisms, veto powers, management obligations, restraints of trade, and breach of warranties or indemnities. Share sale disputes often arise after completion, when buyers discover alleged misrepresentations or undisclosed liabilities. Because these agreements govern control, ownership, and financial outcomes, breaches frequently result in high-value claims and urgent court intervention.
Dealing With Corporations Disputes
What You Get
Corporate disputes refer to any altercation between two or more entities that may hold an economic or legal stake in the disagreement. These arguments typically come about due to a difference of opinion concerning control of assets or services, or the settlement of fees or royalties.
No Hidden Costs
In addition, corporate disputes can be triggered by questionable business practices, contractual infringements, or appropriating another company’s intellectual property. As such, the parties must engage in dialogue or take the dispute to a legal tribunal.
Claim A No Obligation Free Case Evaluation
Discuss Your Case With A Trusted Corporations Lawyer
The Litigation Process
At Stonegate Legal, we provide a clear, structured, and commercially focused approach to corporate dispute resolution, tailored to the realities of running and protecting a business.
Initial Corporate Dispute Consultation
Our experienced corporate disputes lawyers conduct a detailed initial consultation to understand the company structure, governing documents, and commercial objectives at stake. We assess the legal merits of the dispute, identify key risks, and advise on your rights and obligations under Australian corporate and contract law. This allows us to develop a clear strategy aligned with your commercial priorities.
Early Case Analysis and Strategic Advice
We review shareholders agreements, constitutions, director duties, contracts, and financial records to identify breaches, leverage points, and potential remedies. At this stage, we advise whether the matter is best resolved through negotiation, statutory remedies, or court proceedings, ensuring decisions are informed and cost-effective.
Pre-Litigation Negotiation and Dispute Resolution
Where appropriate, we pursue early resolution through structured negotiation or alternative dispute resolution. This may involve resolving shareholder oppression claims, director disputes, contractual breaches, or management deadlocks. Our focus is on protecting your position while seeking outcomes that preserve value and minimise business disruption.
Commencing Court Proceedings
If resolution cannot be achieved, we commence court proceedings in the appropriate jurisdiction, including the Supreme Court. We prepare all pleadings, manage procedural requirements, and advance your case with precision. Whether acting for a company, shareholder, or director, we ensure your claim or defence is supported by strong legal and factual foundations.
Urgent Relief and Interim Orders
In high-risk or time-critical matters, we can seek urgent court orders, including injunctions or interlocutory relief. These measures may be necessary to prevent asset dissipation, restrain improper conduct, protect confidential information, or preserve the status quo while the dispute is determined.
Claims for Compensation and Remedies
We pursue all available remedies, including damages, buy-out orders, declaratory relief, and orders regulating the future conduct of the company. Our objective is to achieve outcomes that properly reflect the financial and commercial impact of the dispute.
Post-Judgment Enforcement and Implementation
Following a successful outcome, we assist with enforcing court orders and implementing settlements. This may include enforcing monetary judgments, overseeing share transfers, or ensuring compliance with governance orders to bring the dispute to a definitive close.
We start by meeting with you to understand the dispute, the company structure, and what outcome you need. We’ll give clear advice on your rights and options in a corporate dispute—whether you’re a shareholder, director, or the company itself.
Before taking formal steps, we assess the urgency, risks, and best leverage points, including whether interim orders may be needed. We also map out the most efficient pathway to resolution, including negotiation, mediation, or court.
We review the facts and key documents (constitution, shareholders agreement, board minutes, contracts, financials) to identify the real issues. This helps confirm the strongest causes of action or defences and sets the strategy from the outset.
Where appropriate, we prepare a structured letter of demand or formal notice setting out the breach, the evidence, and the remedy sought. This often prompts early resolution and positions you strongly if litigation becomes necessary.
Not every corporate dispute needs court—many can be resolved through a buy-out, negotiated exit, governance changes, or commercial settlement. We explain the available options and recommend the approach that best protects value and control.
We engage with the other side to pursue a fast, commercial resolution without sacrificing your legal position. This may include negotiating shareholder exits, director resignations, repayment terms, confidentiality undertakings, or settlement deeds.
We help you secure and organise the evidence needed to prove your case, including emails, financial records, company registers, board materials, and witness evidence. We also focus on preserving evidence early to avoid spoliation and strengthen your negotiating position.
If resolution is not achievable, we commence proceedings in the appropriate court and manage the matter end-to-end. We prepare the pleadings, handle urgent applications, and run the litigation with a clear focus on commercial outcomes.
In urgent corporate disputes, we can seek injunctions to protect assets, restrain improper conduct, or preserve the status quo. This can be critical where there is a risk of asset dissipation, misuse of confidential information, or oppressive control measures.
If the matter proceeds to a final hearing, we prepare the evidence and legal arguments and advocate for you throughout the process. We ensure the court understands both the legal issues and the commercial context driving the dispute.
Depending on the dispute, the court can make orders such as a share buy-out, compensation, declarations, injunctions, or governance and management orders. We pursue the remedies that best protect your commercial position and bring the dispute to a definitive end.
We quantify and pursue losses caused by the dispute, including business interruption, diverted profits, misappropriated funds, or contractual losses. Where appropriate, we also seek orders for interest and legal costs.
After judgment or settlement, we help enforce orders and implement outcomes, including recovering money, transferring shares, or ensuring compliance with injunctions. We stay involved until the result is effectively carried out and the risk of relapse is managed.
Testimonial
At our Stonegate Legal, client satisfaction is our top priority. We are proud to have served hundreds of corporate and commercial clients who have had positive experiences working with us.
Stonegate Legal assisted my business from a strong legal perspective, while highlighting valuable strategy. They have the perfect sized firm to help with all matters either big or small. Wayne is a rare expert in Debt Recovery and his knowledge is extensive.
We had tried for 6mths to get payment from one of our debtors - Damon and the Stonegate Legal team were able to secure full payment within 30days. Sincerely appreciate the efficiency and professionalism.
Stonegate Legal provided good advice, and got us the outcome we were looking for. They were easy to deal with and kept me well informed through the process letting me know the options available as well as their advice.
The entire team at Stonegate Legal have been exceptional to deal with making a difficult situation so much easier to deal with, very pleasant and efficient, I highly recommend them.
Request a Free Consultation
Don’t let corporate disputes ruin your life. Take action today by contacting us for a consultation.
Our Team
Meet Our Corporations Disputes Team
Legal Practice Director / Principal Solicitor
Wayne Davis
Wayne Davis is the principal solicitor, legal practice director of the firm, and leads the litigation team. Wayne has an LLB, and GDLP and is admitted to the Supreme Court of Queensland and the High Court of Australia. Wayne is a debt recovery, litigation, and insolvency professional.
Wayne is dedicated to achieving the best possible outcomes, whether through strategic negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or courtroom advocacy.
Wayne understand that every case is unique and takes a proactive approach to ensure your rights and interests are protected at every stage of the process.
Education & Certifications
LLB – Bachelor of Laws
Personal Quote
Don’t believe everything you think.
Areas of Interest
Building and Construction ⦿ Civil/Personal Litigation ⦿ Commercial Lease Disputes Commercial Litigation ⦿ Corporations Disputes ⦿ Debt Recovery/Collection ⦿ Defamation Litigation ⦿ Insolvency Law ⦿ Statutory Demands ⦿ Tax Debt Disputes ⦿ Wills/Estate Litigation
Solicitor
Kirsty Walker
Kirsty has come into the legal profession later in life, having been a primary school teacher for 24 years. Her interest in the law stemmed from running a small construction company.
After self-representing against debtors, she came to value the ability of the law to assist contractors in David and Goliath situations. Kirsty is admitted to the Supreme Court of Queensland and the High Court of Australia.
Education & Certifications
Personal Quote
Areas of Interest
Building and Construction ⦿ Civil/Personal Litigation ⦿ Commercial Lease Disputes ⦿ Commercial Litigation ⦿ Corporations Disputes ⦿ Defamation Litigation ⦿ Wills/Estate Litigation
Paralegal
Maddison Payne
Maddi is an emerging legal professional currently undertaking a Bachelor of Laws with Honours at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), where she is committed to excelling both academically and professionally.
At the outset of her career, Maddi applies a methodical and research-oriented approach to all aspects of legal support, ensuring thorough case preparation and a deep understanding of legal procedures. Her dedication to both her studies and her work is reflected in her meticulous attention to detail and her drive for delivering high-quality results.
Maddi is committed to providing valuable and effective support to our senior legal team, leveraging her academic foundation and professional skills to assist on complex cases with accuracy and integrity. With a keen interest and focus for matters concerning defamation, corporate litigation, professional negligence, corporate disputes, and commercial litigation, she is driven to developing a comprehensive understanding of law that underpins her work as a paralegal and future prospects of becoming a lawyer.
Education & Certifications
Bachelor of Laws LLB (Honours) (completing), Diploma of Business BSB (Communications & Media)
Personal Quote
Keep your concentration here and now where it belongs. Be mindful of the future, but not at the expense of the moment.
Areas of Interest
Civil/Personal Litigation ⦿ Commercial Litigation ⦿ Corporations Disputes⦿ Defamation Litigation
FAQ
Corporate Dispute Frequently Asked Questions
What is a corporate dispute? A corporate dispute is a legal conflict involving a company’s ownership, management, governance, or commercial relationships. It commonly arises between shareholders, directors, business partners, or related entities. Corporate disputes often involve overlapping issues such as directors’ duties, shareholder rights, contracts, and alleged misuse of company assets. Early advice can prevent the dispute escalating into costly litigation and business disruption.
What are the most common corporate disputes in Australia? The most common corporate disputes involve shareholder conflict (including minority oppression), alleged breaches of directors’ duties, and disputes under shareholders or share sale agreements. These matters usually centre on control, access to information, money, and decision-making power. In private companies, disputes often escalate quickly because ownership and management are closely tied. A clear strategy is critical to protect value and minimise operational damage.
What is minority shareholder oppression? Minority shareholder oppression occurs where those in control conduct the company’s affairs in a way that is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or unfairly discriminatory to a shareholder. Common examples include exclusion from management, withholding financial information, diverting business opportunities, or diluting shares. Oppression claims can lead to significant court-ordered remedies, including buy-out orders. The strongest cases are usually built on documents, conduct patterns, and financial evidence.
Can a shareholder force a buy-out in a corporate dispute? In many corporate disputes, a buy-out is a common and practical remedy, particularly where ongoing co-ownership is no longer workable. A buy-out may be negotiated under a shareholders agreement, or ordered by a court as part of oppression-type remedies. Valuation methodology, discounts, and timing are usually the key battlegrounds. The strategy should focus on securing a fair price while protecting the company’s continuity and goodwill.
What are directors’ duties and how do disputes arise? Directors’ duties include acting with care and diligence, in good faith, for a proper purpose, and in the best interests of the company. Disputes commonly arise where directors are alleged to have conflicts of interest, misuse their position, or prefer personal interests over the company’s interests. These claims can carry serious consequences, including compensation orders and personal liability. Evidence often turns on board minutes, related-party dealings, and financial records.
What is a deadlock dispute and how is it resolved? A deadlock dispute occurs when shareholders or directors cannot reach decisions required to run the company, causing operations to stall. This is common in 50/50 companies where there is no casting vote or workable dispute resolution mechanism. Deadlocks can be resolved through negotiation, mediation, buy-sell provisions, or court intervention in serious cases. The goal is usually to restore workable governance or engineer a clean exit.
How do shareholders agreement disputes happen? Shareholders agreement disputes often arise when the written agreement does not match how the business is actually being run. Common issues include breaches of voting arrangements, appointment rights, dividend policies, restraints of trade, and exit provisions. Disputes also arise around valuation clauses, drag/tag rights, and enforcement of transfer restrictions. A document-first approach is essential because the contract usually sets the rules of engagement.
What are share sale agreement disputes and warranty claims? Share sale disputes often arise after completion when a buyer alleges misrepresentations, undisclosed liabilities, or breaches of warranties and indemnities. The fight usually focuses on disclosure, causation, time limits, and how loss should be calculated. Sellers often defend these claims by relying on disclosure schedules and contractual limitations. Early forensic review of the sale documents and financial evidence is critical to protect your position.If the review accuses you of criminal behaviour, unethical conduct, or dishonesty (without proof), it may be considered defamatory. Even reviews that don’t name you directly can be defamatory if readers can clearly identify you or your business.
What is misappropriation of company funds or assets? Misappropriation occurs when company money, property, or resources are used for unauthorised purposes, including personal benefit or related-party advantage. This may involve improper payments, unexplained expenses, diverted revenue, or transactions that do not benefit the company. These matters can overlap with directors’ duties, fiduciary obligations, and potential fraud allegations. Swift action is often required to preserve evidence and prevent further loss.
Can the court order an injunction in a corporate dispute? Courts can grant injunctions to stop conduct that threatens the company or a party’s rights, especially where damages later may not be adequate. Injunctions are commonly sought to restrain asset dissipation, protect confidential information, prevent oppressive conduct, or preserve the status quo. Because injunction applications are evidence-heavy and time-sensitive, preparation matters. The key is showing urgency, a serious question to be tried, and that the balance of convenience favours the order.
How long do corporate disputes usually take to resolve? The timeframe depends on complexity, urgency, and whether the matter resolves commercially or proceeds to court. Some disputes settle quickly once documents are exchanged and positions are tested, while others take many months or longer through litigation. Urgent applications can move faster, but they can also increase cost and pressure. A structured strategy can shorten timelines by focusing on leverage points and realistic outcomes.
What evidence is important in corporate dispute litigation? Key evidence usually includes constitutions, shareholders agreements, board minutes, financial statements, bank records, company registers, and communications such as emails and messages. In director-duty and oppression matters, patterns of decision-making and related-party dealings are often central. Evidence preservation is critical, particularly where access to company records is contested. A well-organised brief typically improves both settlement prospects and court outcomes.
Should I try mediation before going to court in a corporate dispute? Mediation is often a sensible step because corporate disputes are expensive, disruptive, and commercially sensitive. It can allow tailored outcomes that courts may not provide easily, such as structured exits, governance changes, or staged payments. However, the timing matters—mediation is most effective when the key documents and evidence have been identified. We usually treat mediation as a strategic tool, not a box-ticking exercise.